This is somewhat similar to Bug 415014. I am currently working on the FreeBSD port of gs 10 and I don't understand this inconsistency: website says: The current Ghostscript release 10.0.0 downloaded tarball says: ghostscript-10.0.0.tar.gz as well as the expanded directory base/version.mak says: GS_VERSION_MINOR=00 throughout code '"%d.%02d.%d", major, minor, patch' is used 'gs --help | head -1' says: GPL Ghostscript 10.00.0 (2022-09-21) 'gs --version' says: 10.00.0 'gs | head -1' says: GPL Ghostscript 10.0.0 (2022-09-21) Something does not add up here. Can you please make it consistent throughout the base, at least in the printf() output from code?
https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/ghostpdl-downloads/releases/tag/gs1000 says: 10.0.0, comment refers to next version as 10.01.0
Basically, it's an oversight, or two... I have a fix for the banner (the issue there was that it's printed in Postscript), and I'll be more careful in the release process.
The version should be of the form "10.00.0", so the banner printed on startup is addressed here: https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=cc86ef9a4948 The release archives and Windows installers just need me to pay a bit closer attention to what I type when I do the release.
(In reply to Chris Liddell (chrisl) from comment #3) > The version should be of the form "10.00.0", so the banner printed on > startup is addressed here: > > https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=cc86ef9a4948 > > The release archives and Windows installers just need me to pay a bit closer > attention to what I type when I do the release. Thanks, looking forward to a consistent 10.00.1
I can confirm that this in GH, tarball and inline version stick together for 10.01.0rc2. Looking forward to the frontpage when 10.01.0 is releasd.