| Summary: | Markup annotation opacity is not respected | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | MuPDF | Reporter: | Zachary Travis <ztravis> |
| Component: | mupdf | Assignee: | MuPDF bugs <mupdf-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | sebastian.rasmussen |
| Priority: | P4 | ||
| Version: | master | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Customer: | Word Size: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Example PDF | ||
I'll close the bug, but it was fixed by Tor in commit 7644c1347ddef5c519e4722e93ed934eb4cdeab2 Author: Tor Andersson <tor.andersson@artifex.com> Date: Fri May 7 17:02:18 2021 +0200 Bug 702993: Support annotation opacity for all markup annotation types. Thank you! |
Created attachment 19955 [details] Example PDF Mupdf does not respect the "CA" entry that is allowed for all "markup annotations" (which includes most annotation types, e.g. square, etc). This is evident in some of the annotations on a sample PDF I found on another bug, which I'll attach here - see for example the pink-colored text box on page four, or the filled oval on page 12. I have a patch to fix this which I am happy to provide - the main reason I am not doing so now is that we aren't handling the "Resource" dictionary in the cleanest way - some annotation types need to e.g. add fonts, etc - and so it might make sense to refactor that first.