The bug report in the URL field is against poppler, but mupdf also gets it wrong (albeit in a different way.) GS (8.64) renders the gradient the same as acro does, something akin to: FFFF EEEE DDDD CCCC .etc. 1111 0000 whereas mupdf makes it look more like: FEDC EDCB DCBA CBA9 .etc.
It's an image not a linear gradient. I suspect it's the same bug as 690666 where our interpolation on the edges of images is wrong.
> It’s an image not a linear gradient. Ah. As you can guess I didn’t confirm the OR’s diagnosis, just compared everyone’s output and parroted the bug report here, too, when I saw that mupdf also got it wrong....
Added two patches to the darcs repository that should fix all image interpolation and image pixel offset bugs similar to this one.
Closing resolved bugs which I reported.