Bug 690453 - bitstream font system not supported
Summary: bitstream font system not supported
Status: RESOLVED LATER
Alias: None
Product: Ghostscript
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Font API (show other bugs)
Version: master
Hardware: Macintosh All
: P4 enhancement
Assignee: Chris Liddell (chrisl)
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-04-27 14:32 UTC by Henry Stiles
Modified: 2019-10-21 08:32 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Customer:
Word Size: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Henry Stiles 2009-04-27 14:32:16 UTC
As part of the Font API project we should support TrueDoc, see
http://www.bitstream.com/font_rendering/products/tdis/overview.html.  We need to
contact bitstream, there is a link at the bottom of the overview page, and
arrange to get the TrueDoc system, then get it to work with our interpreters. 
Hopefully it will be similar to Monotype, the new Zoran offering supports the
BitStream renderer.  I thought this should be tied in with the font api project,
which seems to lack an end user deliverable, let me know if you want to handle
it differently.
Comment 1 Ralph Giles 2009-04-27 15:40:36 UTC
It makes sense as a requirement for the design work, so I'm fine with the bug.
Thanks for the reminder. The end user deliverable is better support for
alternate font renders, but you're correct that we've been focussed on the
internal advantages of separating font parsing at the interpreter level from
rendering through the graphics library.
Comment 2 Ken Sharp 2010-05-15 09:49:19 UTC
Outline support has been added in revision 11259. This is little more than a proof of possibility, the current code only works with type 1 PostScript fonts. However addition of other font types should be reasonably possible from this starting point.

Re-assigning this one to Chris for future enhancements.
Comment 3 Chris Liddell (chrisl) 2019-10-21 08:32:34 UTC
I don't believe we need to track this in bugzilla any more.

In 10 years, we've never had a request for Bitstream. We already have Freetype and UFST, and a skeleton for Bitstream, and completing it shouldn't be more complex than the existing two. If a credible requirement for it arises, we'll finish the work. But as of now, I'm closing this.