Bug 689981 - comparefiles\PDF_cover_page.pdf Error: /invalidrestore in --restore--
Summary: comparefiles\PDF_cover_page.pdf Error: /invalidrestore in --restore--
Status: NOTIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ghostscript
Classification: Unclassified
Component: PDF Interpreter (show other bugs)
Version: master
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P4 normal
Assignee: Alex Cherepanov
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-26 01:32 UTC by leonardo
Modified: 2008-12-19 08:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Customer:
Word Size: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description leonardo 2008-07-26 01:32:59 UTC 
rev 8875 fails with ppmraw -r600. 
I didn't check whether older revisions fail.
Comment 1 Alex Cherepanov 2008-07-26 21:15:55 UTC 
This works for me: gswin32c -onul -r600 -sDEVICE=ppmraw PDF_cover_page.pdf

Please provide your command line and some info about your platform.
Comment 2 leonardo 2008-07-26 23:52:29 UTC 
Reproduced with Revision 8877 MSVC8 debug build on Vista 64 with this command 
line :


F:\AFPL\MLC2\comp-opt-z1>..\..\gs-hdr\bin\gswin32c.exe -IF:/AFPL/gs-
hdr/lib;f:\afpl\fonts -E -r300 -dMaxBitmap=100000000 -dNOOUTERSAVE -dNOPAUSE  -
dBATCH -sDEVICE=ppmraw -sOutputFile=z:\t1\\hdr.ppm -dLastPage=1 
H:\AuxFiles\comparefiles\PDF_cover_page.pdf -c quit  1>>hdr-1.log 2>o


Build options :

NMAKE src/msvc32.mak  XCFLAGS=/DDEBUG_TRACE_PS_OPERATORS  
FEATURE_DEVS_EXTRA=./obj/rasterop.dev DEBUG=1 TDEBUG=1 DEBUGSYM=1 
MSVC_VERSION=8 DEVSTUDIO=M:
Comment 3 Alex Cherepanov 2008-07-28 05:40:05 UTC 
Fix extraction of the default subfile from PDF file collection on save
level 0. Export the file name as a PS name from PDF interpreter instance
to protect the name from restore.

Exporting this value as a global composite object doesn't work when PDF
interpreter runs on the save level 0. If we ever implement processing of
multiple files from PDF collection the interface will need some changes.

The following patch is committed as a rev. 8889.
http://ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2008-July/008468.html
Regression testing shows no differences.