Bug 689248 - The PDF interpreter performance
Summary: The PDF interpreter performance
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Ghostscript
Classification: Unclassified
Component: PDF Interpreter (show other bugs)
Version: 0.00
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P4 normal
Assignee: Robin Watts
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-05-24 15:24 UTC by leonardo
Modified: 2017-07-28 07:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Customer:
Word Size: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description leonardo 2007-05-24 15:24:30 UTC
I disabled the shading rasterization with immediate returning from patch_fill 
in gxshade6.c . The file Bug689189.pdf renders to -r140 display in 23 seconds. 
Adobe does in 5 seconds including shadings.
Comment 1 Ray Johnston 2009-05-10 09:00:40 UTC
This seems like it should be Michael's (internal shading speed). Reassigning.
Comment 2 Michael Vrhel 2011-06-11 23:38:46 UTC
Assigning to Robin since he is working in this area.
Comment 3 Ken Sharp 2017-07-28 07:28:12 UTC
Testing this on my PC with a release version of Ghostscript; MuPDF saves the file to PNG in 3.1 seconds, Acrobat takes 5.1 to save an RGB PNG file and Ghostscript takes 7.1 seconds. Admittedly we are still slower than the others, but not *that* much slower.

Especially given that the Acrobat time was taken when the Acrobat was already loaded, and the file displayed, whereas Ghostscript was timed from the command line.

I'm closing this because I expect we're as good as we're likely to get.