This issue is factored out from Bug 687667. We did a small experimenting with CPSI about stroking lines, which are not within a font character. With "false setstrokeadjust" it rounds the width to pixels, then applies the "any part of pixel inside" rule. With "true setstrokeadjust" it rounds the width to pixels, then applies the "pixel center inside" rule. So by Adobe, the width differs with strokeadjust and with no it. Ghostscript paints same width. In any case, likely it never paints a fractional width, but need to test more for sure.
Reassigning path and fill problems to Robin Watts.
Reassigning to new email address.
Enhancement still missing in Ghostscript 9.03
Has this been fixed? Using the following code it seems to behave as described by Igor Melichev: ``` false setstrokeadjust 1.3 setlinewidth newpath 10 10.1 moveto 100 10.1 lineto stroke true setstrokeadjust newpath 100 10.1 moveto 190 10.1 lineto stroke showpage ```
It looks like this was fixed with this commit: http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2004-September/004893.html
Created attachment 20413 [details] A test case and testing results Stroking width is still different.