Bug 493348 - Add image smoothing for better display
Summary: Add image smoothing for better display
Status: NOTIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ghostscript
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Graphics Library (show other bugs)
Version: master
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement
Assignee: Robin Watts
URL:
Keywords:
: 687394 688516 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-12-14 08:49 UTC by Ray Johnston
Modified: 2011-10-02 02:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Customer: 1110
Word Size: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ray Johnston 2001-12-14 08:49:35 UTC
Originally reported by: rayjj@users.sourceforge.net
An Artifex customer has requested this enhancement (id #671).

When Acrobat Reader displays PDF pages that contain images
that are higher resolution than the display, the displayed image
is a smoothed or averaged representation.

Note that this type of smoothing does NOT conform to the
PDF 1.3 2nd edition specification, and Acrobat Reader 4
and 5 seem to use slightly different algorithms for deciding
when to apply smoothing and how the smoothing is done.

This will not the the default behaviour, but a settable parameter
will be implemented to invoke image smoothing with GS.

The difference in image handling between Ghostscript and
Adobe Acrobat has been noticed (and complained about)
by other users in the past.

Detailed discussion and proposed specification will take
place on the gs-devel and gs-code-review mailing lists
on ghostscript.com.
Comment 1 L. Peter Deutsch 2001-12-14 16:26:59 UTC
Comment originally by lpd@users.sourceforge.net
Logged In: YES 
user_id=8861

Please explain why this function must be different from the
one already provided by the Interpolate flag in image
dictionaries.
Comment 2 Ray Johnston 2003-10-30 11:47:53 UTC
Created attachment 345 [details]
Color Background image shows problem

The background image looks really bad, particularly at resolutions
near 75. -dDOINTERPOLATE helps a bit, but even at -r74, this looks
bad.
Comment 3 Ray Johnston 2005-01-25 18:08:24 UTC
*** Bug 687394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Ray Johnston 2006-02-01 09:47:12 UTC
*** Bug 688516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Ray Johnston 2006-02-27 17:27:21 UTC
Replace with current customer that has seen this effect (REF. 687394)
Comment 6 Henry Stiles 2008-05-07 22:27:09 UTC
reassigning to Ray since he recently made some improvements in this area.  I
didn't check if it was fixed.
Comment 7 Ray Johnston 2010-10-12 15:10:15 UTC
Since Robin has done a better image downscaling filter, assigning to him so
that he can have the pleasure of closing this really old bug.
Comment 8 Robin Watts 2010-10-12 16:40:24 UTC
The downscaling changes in revision 11786 seem to solve this.