Summary: | Regression: difference with r11549 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ghostscript | Reporter: | Marcos H. Woehrmann <marcos.woehrmann> |
Component: | Text | Assignee: | Ken Sharp <ken.sharp> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P4 | ||
Version: | master | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | All | ||
Customer: | Word Size: | --- |
Description
Marcos H. Woehrmann
2010-08-04 23:16:10 UTC
Created attachment 6610 [details]
11549.png
(In reply to comment #0) > I've been going through the thousands of differences caused by r11549 and so > far have come across one file which appears to be a regression. See the > attached 11548.png and 11549.png files. > > The command lines used: > > bin/gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -o test.pdf -r300 ./Bug687044.ps > bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -o test.ppm -r300 ./test.pdf Actually this file has always been wrong. By some weird co-incidence Ghostscript was previously able to produce the expected result, but Acrobat (our reference) always missed the offending text. This is believed to be another manifestation of type 3 font problems with pdfwrite, and we already have an open report for this (which already includes this file). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 691383 *** |